Instant Fanzine - Epic Fantasy [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Instant Fanzine

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Book Group: Perdido Street Station Book Group: The Fortress of Solitude Book Group: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time Book Group: Neuromancer Book Group: Tales of the City ]

Epic Fantasy [Feb. 19th, 2010|09:50 am]
Previous Entry Share Next Entry

instant_fanzine

[ninebelow]
[Tags|, ]

There were a lot of options in yesterday's poll. Here is a simpler one picking up on a recurrign theme of the comments:

Epic fantasy

GOOD
12(54.5%)
BAD
10(45.5%)
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: andrewducker
2010-02-19 10:02 am (UTC)

(Link)

I like Good writing. I don't like Bad writing. I wish more Good writers would get published and don't understand why publishers keep producing books by Bad writers.
[User Picture]From: andrewducker
2010-02-19 10:06 am (UTC)

(Link)

And I've posted a chunk of poll over here with a simplified question:
http://andrewducker.livejournal.com/1968005.html
[User Picture]From: dyfferent
2010-02-19 11:57 am (UTC)

(Link)

The term is bad. The actual product is widely variable but in the main conforms to Sturgeon's Law.
[User Picture]From: lil_shepherd
2010-02-19 12:50 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Not answering that.

It depends.
[User Picture]From: rparvaaz
2010-02-19 05:43 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Where is the "It depends" button?

Goodkind Epic Fantasy is Bad. GRRM Epic Fantasy is Good.

Some Epic Fantasy is Good if I am ill and on bedrest, Not So Good if I am busy with work and life....stuff like that.